Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm saying this for the last time: The brief character descriptions were not enough for those who hadn't read the book, which is very long, to understand who was good and who was bad, so they asked me to provide a description of the world in the Mafia games I had played before. Usually, in those games, the world was either a fictional one created by the GM, or an existing one like "Dune," "Game of Thrones," or "Warhammer," and the description was usually found on a wiki. Don't you agree that a description created and edited by fans over months will always be better than something a person can write in a day? That's why I was so confused by the reluctance to follow the link and read the character and plot descriptions on the wiki. And when I finally gave in to the pressure and spent several hours copying and editing the description, I only received more negativity in response. Now, it turns out that I'm supposed to delete all of that and rewrite it in my own words. I calculated how much time that would take, and I got really angry. And then, when they started attacking me for being angry, they ask if they can expect a positive response? Do they deserve it?
Couldn't it have been simpler, just writing "good" and "bad" directly in the message with the setting, above the commands? What's with all the difficulties?