Workshop

Probably, she meant, for example, the complete absence of punctuation in the description, which makes the reading process quite difficult. + when I read it for the first time, I didn't quite understand who was evil and who was good (I'm not familiar with the theme), because I hardly saw any killing Necromancers, there was only control everywhere.

Of course, absolute evil is The Confessor. She wants to deprive the whole world of its will and uses the wonderful feeling of love as a weapon. Magister Ral is a dictator, but he cares about his people and protects them, deriving pleasure from sophisticated tortures. And the champion of good is the Wanderer – he wants to destroy all magic so that people can live by their labor:smile06:. In fact, everything is explained in the wiki – just type "rules of the wizard". Regarding punctuation: I have a silicone keyboard – I have to press the keys very hard for them to register. If I miss a letter, the spell checker marks it in red, but if it's a comma or a dash, it doesn't.

Why are you getting so upset right away? This is not the most useful quality for a GM.

. Sorry – just memories: In 2007-2008, I argued a lot with trolls on an anime forum – to avoid giving them a reason to shout: "You didn't answer my question about... so you have nothing to say!" I answered everyone by fully quoting their post and analyzing each line. People started complaining that they couldn't distinguish my text from the original, quoted text. I started using bright colors. For example, in one comment, I quoted three full posts and highlighted my old phrases (which they quoted from me) in blue, and new replies in green, red, and purple. Then they started saying that they couldn't understand me because "it's impossible to read – my eyes are bleeding!" and even complained to the moderators to ban me from using more than two colors in one comment. I started using different fonts, highlights, and underlines instead of colors – it took a lot of time, but I still received the same responses: "I didn't get it," "Did you write about this? Where? Show me, I didn't find it!" In general, I now have an allergy to such "whims": after all, if you had the strength to write a comment, it means your eyes didn't bleed – so what's the point of these hyperboles?

You can give Darken one protection against the Confessor until he gets the boxes, although this will ruin the whole point: everyone is vulnerable at the beginning – the Confessor is vulnerable to the Wanderer, Darken Ral is vulnerable to the Confessor, the Wanderer is vulnerable to everyone. Otherwise, it will be OP

Added after 17 minutes

There's a good idea to remove the word "city" from the set, call the sisters, for example, "The Palace of Prophets," and arrange a "free-for-all" without these conventions of "good" vs. "bad".
I understand that then it will no longer be Mafia, and the idea may not appeal to everyone. I can only speak for myself – I would join such a game.

The names are, of course, conditional. One of the best Mafia games I played was a battle for power between five mafia groups: angels, demons, humans, forces of nature, and elementals. So, at most, there could be up to six murders per night (there was also a necromancer maniac who killed everyone and won):D

Added after 8 minutes
After the Confessor's death, her acolytes die – they love her and cannot live without her. Neutrals win either together with the faction they joined or if the Wanderer, the Barbarian, Mrisviz, the killing Dharians (the Magister and the General), and the Sister of Darkness die