Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

It was after such incidents that I wrote to the judges on the forum, stating that I would act in the same way in the future.

This is understandable; it's a good way to point out the flaws in the rules (by the way, hackers who engage in similar searches for exploits for the benefit of society are often arrested – it's not worth emulating them). However, what will you say in response to the arguments repeatedly presented here in favor of adhering strictly to the letter of the rules?