Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

And the rules should remain rules; they should only be overloaded with a list of exceptions if borderline situations constantly arise. The situation being discussed is clearly not one that occurs frequently.

I completely agree with you on this; in fact, that's what I wrote in my previous post.

And, of course, this should be done without stomping one's feet and shouting, "You're all ****! I demand! Down with the rules!"

Lizard's first post on this topic wasn't at all like that. And then he just got upset because he was being told in unison that "the rules are the rules, it's your fault – replay," without anyone bothering to understand the situation. Of course, getting upset is bad in any case, and I'm not trying to excuse Lizard, but he can be understood.

By the way, regarding the main topic. The issue has been resolved; will there be a replay?