Which castle is the most difficult?

Lider1 well, I expressed my opinion, and you reacted so aggressively to my message.

And what is aggressive about it? Did I insult you somehow? Offend you?
Or is this "!" symbol aggression to you?

It seems like, if I wrote about a different Castle, you would react the same way.

It depends entirely on what was written.

Basically:

Tazar, with his super defense (which Mephala and Nila also have, but the latter two are definitely better for me), will lose to any mage (he simply won't make it, and the units will be eliminated one by one while Tazar watches his super-protected, blinded mobs without mana).

Well, in essence, Tazar levels up better in defense, that's for sure. And he doesn't have any stupid "luck" stat that just clutters the skill tree and is only good for a weak hero, but not for the main hero. Mephala? She's also good in terms of spells, but because the chance of Tazar getting a defense bonus is higher, she looks a little better. Why? Because a higher defense allows you to get into objects early on, where you can make good money. Namely, the Hive, the Cons, and the Dwellings, and he will hold up well there. This applies to other battles as well, of course. And the fact that he will lose to any mage is funny, and do you know why? Because it's easier to turn a warrior hero into a mage. Yes, precisely because you can get Dragon Utopias and acquire cool artifacts earlier. And if you get a red orb (which, by the way, is not uncommon), then this argument ends instantly.

Double moat - a significant advantage in defense, it can hold back the enemy hero, while another Castle would already be taken.

Yes, it's a huge advantage.

Comparing Lizards with archers, I think it's just funny, Valeska will fill any Vistan with arrows before you can blink.

We can play. Show me? Or better yet, try playing a few times as Vistan in single-player. Maybe things will become clearer to you.

Once again, constantly defending will not win you the war.

But you are the one defending. I'm telling you! It's your defensive playstyle, I don't know why, I'm all about quickly conquering the map!

Is there a difference between bothering with a build-up (which you won't always achieve) or running around with Archangels?

What prevents you from achieving it?
Archangels are, of course, cool guys, no doubt. But you still have to build them, and they are not cheap. And even the Archangels themselves will have a hard time against an entire army.

And you can also use magic, but not as a "swamp mage" against a normal mage.

You have too much faith in mages. It's clear that you either haven't encountered or haven't encountered very often things like a red orb and a cloak of resistance.

All of this is just my IMHO.

And I'm sure it's your IMHO based on your games against the AI.

P.S. A respected forum member usually doesn't allow himself to pounce on a newbie, even if he's "talking nonsense," but judging by your signature, you are very irritable :smile19: :smile51:

Yes, lol, how am I "respected"? Because of the birds next to my nickname? Or the number of posts? I can't stand listening to people talk nonsense. Especially such nonsense