Rabe
Auto-translated
Dear AK!
The point is: in the first round, GUNNAR simply could not kill even one of my dragons, not even theoretically. Therefore, I simply saved time for both of us by settling in the first round instead of the second. In the second round, NOTHING would have changed. Thus, my question: WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THE HIT-AND-RUN??? Where is the logic here???
2. Due to the resistance taking effect, the spell I used had NO EFFECT. There are no explanations regarding this in the rules. Common sense tells us that this cannot be considered a hit-and-run. Maybe we should also consider using "antimagic" just for fun when the opponent has no mana as a hit-and-run??? What kind of absurdity is this, comrades???
Your logic would also apply to the following case: "A" attacks "B" with the intention of killing him with Armageddon, even though he only has 1 Efreet. Resistance triggers, and no one suffers. Can we proceed to the second round?:)
"Одержать сто побед в ста битвах — это не вершина воинского искусства. Повергнуть врага без сражения — вот вершина.
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."