I agree with the top 10; the results are based on the seasonal ranking, so it makes sense not to include those who haven't played a single game in the season.
The sorting by permanent ranking has also grown significantly – 3 years ago, only 84 players had more than 30 games, and now there are over 200. Therefore, this time, I will raise the bar to 40 games. We'll see what happens in six months.
As usual, I will attach a separate file with statistics for all players; there are already 849 players registered.

I will repeat myself once again!!! Previously, the ranking was calculated differently, and the overall skill level of the players was much lower. Because of this, the inactive top players who previously boosted their ranking are now unattainable even for the current top players. The point of the ranking is to score more, and how to score more, let's say, if previously, I'll allow this word, they used a "BUG" :)) (well, for example, such a word) when calculating the ranking. Based on this, I suggest removing N points from any player with 1700 or more points after 2 seasons of inactivity (for example, 50 or 75). This should only be done for players who are above 1700 in the ranking; if the threshold is below 1700, nothing should be done!:cool: The conditions can, of course, be adjusted