Not a drop in his mouth, not an inch to the... left. It's a pity that the organizer's stubbornness and his endless confidence in his own rightness prevent him from listening to small adjustments. Of course, it's up to him to decide, but sometimes it's also necessary to listen to the players' opinions.

I don't consider myself dissatisfied. I am ready to play with any rules; I confirmed this by signing up for the tournament. I just don't understand why a tiny change that would benefit the rules shouldn't be made?

I'm afraid you're not meant to understand anything anymore. When it's said that the goal of the tournament is to conduct it based on the ranking, you don't understand (and I don't know how else to explain that this is the idea and the desire to run it in this format). When you are told that the goal of the tournament is to determine the captains by voting and distribute the rest into tiers, you also don't understand that. You keep saying that it should be this way or that way, but you clearly don't understand that the goal is not as you say, but something else, because the organizer, when creating the tournament, had the desire to conduct it in this particular format and definitely not without tiers. That's the goal. And it's not because I think you're wrong or I'm right; it's just that when I started creating the tournament, I had my own ideas and I wanted to make it that way, but you just don't understand or don't want to. There are some fundamental things in the rules, and changing them means changing the idea of the tournament, which, of course, you won't understand because you think you know everything... Now, about your 3-2-3. It's nonsense that you don't even seem to have thought about. First, the team selection starts not with a draw, but with a vote for the captains, and each vote determines who will be in what position based on the results of the vote. And when this vote is over, it's silly to talk about who is choosing from which tier (I won't explain why I'm against tiers, I don't think you'll understand). Why vote if, after looking at the vote, everything is replayed "according to convenience":confused: Secondly, if the 2nd tier currently has approximately equal players from first to last, then in the 3rd tier, in the opinion of many, the bottom is weaker than the top. This means that the strongest captains, having chosen, in their opinion, strong players from the 2nd tier, will still get practically equal players as opponents for their chosen ones, but in the 3rd tier, they will already be getting players from the bottom of the 3rd tier, and the bottom, as many write, is weaker. This means that the leading captains lose a little in the draw, which makes it possible to balance the overall compositions. If this is not clear, I don't know how to explain it...