Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Well, starting with the very first FB, the tournament consistently undermines its reputation as a top-tier and exemplary event on HVM. Something needs to change...
Said the person who "ran" a top-tier and exemplary tournament that "slightly" discredited itself. Dima Surmay
The problem isn't the tournament itself, but the people, mainly those involved in its organization.
I don't see anyone who is willing to help those people "who are the problem."
Added 7 minutes later Wicc
Yeah, I realized that after I wrote it, but I was too lazy to correct it. Considering the possible presence of pre-arranged matches in the later stages of the tournament, the number of guaranteed spots is critical for tournament strategy.
No, I'm sorry. The tournament promised 7 guaranteed spots. 7 players from the tournament advance. BUT. nowhere was it written how many spots would be in the FB? Where did the idea come from that there should be 10 participants? :confused: The fact that 2 more spots were added shouldn't concern other participants. The quotas could have been allocated for the winners of other tournaments or for other achievements. This has nothing to do with the OFB. If instead of 7 people, 5 were allowed to advance, that would be a violation. But as it is, they promised 7, and 7 advanced.