Why was it acceptable in this game to make a decision after the time limit expired, especially at such an early stage of the game (turn 131)?
Why wasn't a decision made based on the save file in my game after a much later turn (217) had passed?
Or is that what it's called now?
We try to run FB Tournaments in a varied way, without using standard schemes...
Variability in judging schemes is nothing more than subjectivism. How can we then talk about an objective decision if
The decision regarding this game was made collectively: ... taking into account the participants' positions in the tournament (both were contenders and the result was important for both)...
P.S. The authorship of the crazy idea of transferring a conditional result from one game in a tournament to another tournament (how absurd does that sound) belongs to a dirty player (as he himself admits).
P.P.S. Cobra was offered the option of playing a new FB game before all this happened, but he bravely refused, suggesting three games, and immediately admitting that it was a joke.
Don't change the rules after the tournament has ended; 7 participants had already been clearly determined, but someone is constantly haunted by a weak Buchholz score.
