Skip to content
#6211
Auto-translated
Rabe
I understand with my mind that the rules are optimal, that you can never please everyone, and that there will always be exceptions. Especially when it comes to a game where you can lose because of three morale points in a max-con... and who cares who withdraws and agrees on a draw:)
But I agree with The_ that withdrawals from the tournament should be more strictly regulated.
The most optimal thing would be for withdrawals not to affect the standings at all, but this is only possible if we implement something like what I suggested recently: /topic/at/741977/

And within the framework of the Novice Tournament, I dare to suggest a new scheme:
All participants are not divided into groups in any way, but each has the right to 5 games. You choose your opponent yourself, but you can play against the same one only once. Whoever is lagging behind chooses from those remaining; whoever withdrew doesn't matter at all.
and what happens after these 5 games?) now, all the stronger players will play against the weaker ones, and then what? It turns out that one player plays, say, 10 games, while another plays 6, and how do you keep track of all this? There are currently 24 players, and there have been even more before; what about later? Playoffs? And how do you create pairs, etc.? Don't try to change the rules of existing tournaments; they have already been held many times, and everyone is happy with them. If you are afraid of facing unfairness, just organize fun matches and a season tournament

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil

Users Online 2 users 1123 guests