Auto-translated
Here's an example from your group in the Novice league: a match between Tofsla and Dau. Tofsla did everything to ensure the game took place, but Dau, having lost his chances of qualifying, decided not to waste his time. And what result should I record for this match?
It's simply that when equally skilled players agree to a 0.5 score, it's a mutual decision, while a technical loss is a one-sided outcome. In my opinion, it would be fairer for everyone, even those who previously lost to this player, to consider it a win. This is my view.
In this case, I believe that Tofsla didn't defeat Dau, but simply earned a point. Therefore, if all the games had already been played, the Berger coefficient should not be calculated for this match. But I think the "+" in the table implies this.
PS Hmm, it turns out that the match with Tofsla will be decisive for us, and I was hoping that Dau would dominate:smile51:
"Одержать сто побед в ста битвах — это не вершина воинского искусства. Повергнуть врага без сражения — вот вершина.
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."