Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Let's say a traffic cop told Diablo that he ran a red light, wrote him a ticket, and he signed it, but then realized that the traffic light wasn't working at all. Does this "trust" serve as grounds for not paying the fine?
P.S. I once had a situation where a well-known player hit and ran, left the game, and started writing a report (even though there was no report, because I didn't use magic, I just hit him with an angel and ran away). If I had acknowledged the hit-and-run and realized it a few days later, no one would have talked to me (maybe the opponent would have already played the next game online).
P.P.S. We received another (yet another) controversial situation due to this nasty red rush. When will it finally be removed from the rules? In my opinion, it's better for red to win 10 out of 100 times with an advantage than to have one such situation.
I absolutely agree about the red rush rule; red already has too few advantages. But the comparison with a law enforcement officer and winning because the opponent realized it too late is just... it doesn't even resonate. Even in situations where the opponent disappears during the save and then says they're ready to play on the last day, people usually flip a coin. But here, a loss is automatically recorded for no reason. Yes, this is how decisions are made, and this is how the rules are applied.