Why didn't he ask for a rematch when he realized there was no redresh?

But why didn't Heroin offer a rematch when he realized he had falsely accused his opponent of RR? How can you claim something when you yourself don't know for sure whether you're right or wrong? Maybe the ICQ chat changes the situation somewhat, but overall I think Diabler doesn't deserve to lose.
And in general, the RR situation was and remains the most vulnerable spot in the rules. I think we need to strongly urge the HW rules to be revised to increase the number of RR warnings — for example, when double-clicking on an opponent or their castle for an attack, notify that RR is possible, and accordingly require tournaments to be played with HW rules enabled.
But to do it properly — just scrap this red rush rule altogether. It seems to me that controversial RR situations arise much more often than anyone could actually exploit it. SM is played very rarely, and on Jebus Cross the game rarely reaches the 3rd week, and claiming that growth specifically determines stacks is a stretch.
And overall, guys, let's play by skill rather than pointing out violations that don't actually affect the outcome of the game. Originally, the RR rule was invented to balance troops in FB, hence all the additions to the rule to make it properly understood — but alas, as always, this only causes more disputes. I had a moment in a game with Rasim when I picked up an outside Angel from his respawn on day 1 and attacked his castle. He immediately said it was RR, even though there were only 1-stacks in the castle and I already had 7 Angels in my stack. I believed him, but to be sure I decided to double-check. In the end, I also learned about the rule of unimpeded attack through monoliths, etc