All that remains is to specify the rule that Heroin violated.
The claim "isn't it a red rush?" is clearly not a violation – the player has the right to make any claim, and if the opponent disagrees, the matter is referred to the judge. In this case, the opponent agreed.
Even if Heroin intentionally bluffed towards Diabler, it would not be a violation of the rules, but merely unethical behavior. If he really didn't know (and in the absence of a way to verify this, we should believe him), then game ethics were not violated either.
Both didn't know the rules. Either it's a draw, or the decision is made based on the save.
Although, I also don't like the behavior of one of the opponents during the discussion.
