Skip to content
User Avatar
#1025
Auto-translated
=Lizard=
2. It has long been clear to everyone that the so-called "SoD timer" is archaic because it often negates the difference in skill. For example, for one and the same battle, a top player will spend 2 minutes to complete it with minimal losses, while an average player will spend 5. With a chess clock timer, this can be crucial in determining the outcome of the game. I don't understand what the argument is about at all. If we are talking about pure fun, then of course, any timer doesn't matter. But when it comes to identifying more skilled players within tournaments, the "SoD timer" is simply ridiculous.
The first disconnect eliminates the advantages of the chess clock timer.
P.S. In general, the discussion about the timer should be moved to the thread with voting on it.
Воздам сторицей!