Мафия 85. Lux in tenebris

Bagler's words seem to make sense. But it still doesn't explain what the journalist meant when asking about the mask. Or the role's picture.

Purely theoretically, there is no difference in this, since an incorrect answer was given to this question. There are 3 undeniable truths, assuming that Voldemort really has nothing to do with the set. There is no point in lying at all for question 2. It turns out that they lied about question 1.

Just for the sake of it, I'll analyze the option of lying about question 2, which means the truth about question 1. This means that either Hydra (the role's picture) answered, which contradicts itself, because she would have answered differently to the second question, or Master, or NeiraDrake (avatars, maybe there are other dragons in the avatars, I don't remember), but then they are unarmed or not dangerous. What is the point of a "non-dangerous" person, and therefore a peaceful one, answering questions in this way?

Added 2 minutes later

What is the point of a "non-dangerous" person, and therefore a peaceful one, answering questions in this way?

Although there is a point in one case. If Mr. X was being questioned. Maybe he didn't commit a murder, then he could have answered as he did.