Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What is the nonsense that esteemed Calababa is talking about? Is it that before expressing his moral teachings, he should read the tournament regulations? I thought everyone knew that skirmishes in OFB are played this way, but no... In general, I recommend being more attentive next time, otherwise, newcomers will get confused ;)
I already had a discussion in the Crusader forum about M200; I don't want to get into it again. The people voted for the M200 template, but they ended up with something unclear (an unverified version of the template) just because the organizers decided so. So, do you think people, when voting for a skirmish, thought it wouldn't be random? Or maybe there was a lot of pre-played, haphazard skirmish in the seasonal games? In the end, you put people in an awkward position. The template doesn't allow capturing a castle on day 112; it's just absurd. I'm even surprised that you didn't have a lot of complaints about this, but I guess you had some plan for it, new rules, or something else. I hope you at least played at 200%, although that's your business. I'm also interested in the opinion of the tournament judges on this issue: what were they guided by when choosing this system?