Sanin
Auto-translated
The essence of the topic is much deeper than just one game. As I understand it, there are 3 questions on the agenda.
1. What to do in such situations? The rules don't provide for this, but they should.
2. Is Mizrael an authority as a member of the AK?
3. What is game ethics, and what does it entail?
1.6. Players are advised to agree in advance on how long they can play without interruption, and if there is not enough time and the need to postpone the game, agree on the terms for completing it.
1 month is given to complete the game. If the game is not completed within this time, the players have the right to contact the tournament judge, providing saves of the postponed game and ICQ logs. Each such case is considered individually. The judge acts at his discretion: either a technical victory is awarded (if one of the players ignores offers to complete the game), or a decision is made based on the saves (if the players have mutual problems), or the game is canceled, or another decision is made depending on the circumstances. Players who systematically fail to complete postponed games may be subject to sanctions, up to and including exclusion from the tournament and being placed on the Blacklist.
I have already used this rule, by the way.
However, Mizrael is listed as one of the judges for the season, and in this situation, his judging perspective on the situation seems particularly interesting. If the position stated above ("you lost that game because you played worse") is the judge's position, then what kind of judge is that?
ICQ 423164784