Forum

What, for example? All you hear is "it will be this way because it always has been and always will be," "it needs to be this way because it was this way there and there, because that's how we do it, and you will only do it this way." I don't even read it anymore, even though I used to enjoy it.

You should ask "why" more often. I can provide quite detailed justifications for all my concepts, using historical examples and just plain common sense.

For example, try to ask yourself - why were all the states that, at different times, embodied democracy, maritime states?

Ancient Greece - sea on three sides, mountains to the north
Ancient Rome - sea on three sides, mountains to the north
England - an island
USA - sea on two sides, weak states to the north and south that pose no threat

And as you move further inland, democracy falters more and more, and periods of democracy in continental states are firmly linked to periods of turmoil or fragmentation.

Or, for example, why were all the states that, at different times, embodied democracy, predominantly aggressors on the international stage?

The list is the same - the periods of defensive wars and containment of strong opponents in the history of these countries are the least democratic.

These are quite simple questions; you just need to ask them.

Added 5 minutes ago

Nothing new, it's all the same - "but I know how to do it..." Boring.

It's not new; these are all well-known things. For those who are interested in them. In fact, it is quite simple and logical.

By the way, the Maidan in 2004 was a peaceful demonstration, a kind of democratic manifesto, nothing more.

Can't you see that the Maidan in 2004 and the Maidan in 2014 were done according to the same plan, with minor changes?

I'm not talking about the reasons and motives, but about the perpetrators and the schemes of their actions.