Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Uncle Vic, I noticed a long time ago, and I'm probably not the only one, that while you're knowledgeable about history and skilled in assessing the effectiveness of different forms of government for various segments of the population, you clearly struggle when it comes to deviating from established, obvious norms. And when it comes to predictions, you're completely clueless, just like everyone else here. So, let's be patient and see what happens next. I don't see any circumstances under which your argument could be proven true, regardless of the outcome. Are you just flexing your "skill" by making unsubstantiated claims? If you're going to keep bringing up "the influence of foreign agents," either make it the central point or explain how you envision it. How will you prove or justify your claims without relying on "that's how it was, and that's how it will be"?