Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What is there even to discuss when the fact of the violation is obvious?
It's like a drunk driver – you can drive for your whole life, but if you get caught even once, you lose your license. No exceptions.
I agree with the opinion that someone who has violated the rules once is already a potential offender, and even after the punishment is served, trust will not be restored.
If my friend borrowed my car and I knew he was "under the influence" (even if he didn't get caught and returned it in perfect condition), I would NEVER let him borrow my car again. Not in a year, not in 10 years.
If a person even considers cheating in a game where there are no huge monetary prizes, bets, or other "compelling factors," then that's already a problem.
"Одержать сто побед в ста битвах — это не вершина воинского искусства. Повергнуть врага без сражения — вот вершина. "Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."