Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I can easily understand the arithmetic behind the calculation, but its result is somewhat surprising. In my opinion, the winner should always have the highest rating, and if this is not the case, the rating should be adjusted. As I understand it, AlexeyPank took on the task of considering several parameters in his rating, not just the ratio of days, but the formulas themselves should always produce a logical result, i.e., the positions in the rating should match the positions in the tournament.
The thing is, the bonus coefficient is calculated in a tricky way. It takes into account the previous results of the players. You'