I don't understand the wording of the ruling. It doesn't reflect reality. We played on the 21st, and at Nitro's initiative, we saved the game. Then we played on January 24th; you yourself offered additional dates for the game. During the game, Nitro said he had to leave and we would continue later. I waited for almost 3 hours specifically, then he arrived, said he was tired, and suggested we continue tomorrow. Of course, I was unhappy that I had wasted so much time waiting, but I understood. We continued on January 25th, and again, at Nitro's initiative, we saved the game, although before that, I had been playing with Rebellious all day and was quite tired. And now you're telling me that I'm not meeting the deadlines? And it's being decided unilaterally...

An advantage is not always an advantage; in Heroes, the game can turn around in any way.

If you are basing the result on the non-compliance with the game deadlines, please take into account what I have written. I'm curious how you based this ruling on this point without knowing or asking me who and how agreed, saved, etc.?