CHALLENGE The_ CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, The_'s CHALLENGE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE

R55max-Nitro - R55max had some technical difficulties, and he couldn't play before. The game is being played on a save file; it's the third week of the second month. Nitro has a significant advantage, even according to R55max himself. They were supposed to finish the game on Wednesday, which I strongly disagreed with. Victory in this match is awarded to Nitro due to the opponent's failure to meet the deadlines for the game.

I don't understand the wording of the decision. It doesn't reflect reality. We played on the 21st; at Nitro's initiative, the game was saved. Then we played on January 24th; you yourself gave additional dates for the game. During the game, Nitro said he had to leave and that we would continue later. I waited for almost 3 hours specifically. Then he came back, said he was tired, and suggested we continue tomorrow. Of course, I was unhappy that I had wasted so much time waiting, but I understood. We continued on January 25th, and again, at Nitro's initiative, the game was saved, although before that, I had played with Rebellious all day and was quite exhausted. And now you're telling me that I'm not meeting the deadlines? And it seems to be a one-sided decision...

An advantage is not always an advantage; in Heroes, the game can turn around in any way.

If you are making a decision based on the failure to meet the deadlines for the game, please consider what I have written. I'm curious how you based this decision on this point without knowing or asking me who agreed on what, who saved the game, and so on?