Auto-translated
Don't have a plan? Will this one do?
1. The President – Ukraine doesn't need him. This is part of the Russian mindset: there must be a prince-tsar-emperor-leader-general secretary-president, by the very nature of things. Ukrainians don't have this archetype, due to the people's heightened "freedom," which is why a president doesn't take root.
Well, it's not necessary; let there be a parliamentary republic.
2. Representation of different parties not only in the legislative but also in the executive branch. Because right now, what's happening? The ruling party appoints the government; this is the same thing as with the president, just viewed from a different angle. But it could be: the ruling party appoints a prime minister, and he assembles a team from different parties, say, one ministerial portfolio for every 12-15 deputies. This is undoubtedly a complex administrative task, but the head of state should only be involved in such tasks, selecting suitable people for suitable positions.
3. Separation of the state from business. A declaration that if a person decides to pursue a political career, they cannot engage in business, and neither can their children. And no law can be passed that benefits one enterprise to the detriment of others. Creating such a legal environment in which firms and organizations can only compete through economic means. This should be the main task of the state, which cannot be accomplished in a few years. That is, the main task of the state should be: creating conditions under which the population of Ukraine will peacefully and fairly develop the wealth of their country.
Ukraine's wealth:
30% of the world's black soil reserves (the most productive soil)
reserves of coal, iron, and manganese ore (direct competitors to Russia)
a complete aircraft manufacturing cycle has been preserved
automotive industry (forget about passenger cars, but you can produce your own public transport)
shipbuilding (unfortunately, in a state of suspended animation)
a population of 45 million, a considerable resource and a huge domestic market.
And much more, it just needs a Creator to follow the Destroyers.
This has already been said at the previous Maidan.
The wise leader Yushchenko, the mother of the people Tymoshenko, and as soon as they come to power, Ukraine will immediately start living better than everyone else.
They won, came to power, and immediately started fighting each other. Why didn't they build a free and prosperous Ukraine?
Oh, I understand, those were the bad ones, but these are good and correct leaders.
Now, the Maidan is united only by the desire to overthrow the ruling clan. And (if) they win, how will democrats get along with fascists, the diaspora with football fans? It will obviously be much worse than it is now. I don't believe in a Bandera supporter who, upon coming to power, will proclaim respect and equality for other nations living there, whether they are Jews, Russians, or Poles; that would be some kind of incorrect Bandera supporter, a renegade Bandera supporter.
As a Russian, I don't want to see such chaos in the neighboring country.
The only thing a new leader can capitalize on is the darkest nationalism, as has happened many times, to find enemies and carry out genocide in the name of the nation's future.
I don't like Yanukovych, but the next one will be worse.
If you don't like the president, RE-ELECT HIM THROUGH LEGAL MEANS; right now, he is legitimate because he won the election, and those who are overthrowing him are coup plotters.