Usually, when there's nothing substantial to say, people write these short, limited pieces based on their own narrow worldview, followed by conclusions based on their own assumptions. Thanks, Captain Obvious!
I think I'll go do something more useful.

There is something to say. The problem is, when you're sitting at a computer and can easily pontificate from a bird's-eye view, saying things like "this and that," but if you were to actually go to that Euromaidan and spend two days there, you would understand who and what you are supporting. Then, reread your posts, and I have plenty of worldview; I've been to five European countries and other countries as well. I'm writing this briefly because I don't see the point in trying to convince you of anything; you'll still stick to your guns. (I was upset that you're essentially writing that you're considering the possibility of a civil war, or at least a veiled scenario of a violent power struggle with unknown consequences).

Added 1 minute ago

A question for all revolutionaries: who's next?
a) boxer
b) fascist
c) cunning Jew
d) woman with braids

If the government is overthrown, they will start fighting each other.