Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You're welcome. Having your own opinion is great. However, you shouldn't present it as the only correct one, and especially not speak on behalf of all of Kyiv (Ukraine, Russia, America, the Death Star, or fascist Mars).
Where did I present it as the only correct one? I think I actually wrote that in some matters, I completely agree with the opposite point of view from a theoretical perspective, but my thoughts usually stem from a practical perspective, and from this side, the Maidan is mostly absurd and misguided. In principle, 80% of the Maidan supported this point of view by leaving it. In 2004, the Maidan was only growing, which proved the correctness and purposefulness of the ideas at that time. But then there was only theory, and now people have experience, so they can no longer be easily misled by beautiful speeches. And the opposition has nothing more than beautiful speeches, no plans, no development... As a result, it turns out to be such an absurdity that 80% are against the current government, but only 20% are in favor of the opposition because both are "worthless."
Sanya, just for a moment, imagine the Svoboda party at the helm. That would be even worse than Zhirinovsky...