Nomination for "Player of the Year 2013"

P.S. Regarding the "battle" to determine the strongest player, it's pointless, in my opinion. This is a summary of the year 2013, and it's being done by the viewers. The players have already done what was required of them in 2013.

So, these battles are intended for the viewers. If the audience asks for an encore, why not? "Pointless" refers to a poll where the difference between first and third place will be just a few votes, in my opinion. Such a victory is unlikely to be meaningful. Or maybe I don't quite understand the essence of the nomination? Isn't it about the player who is the most skilled and lucky? If not, then of course, you can vote based on personal preferences.

GOD, Hell - I have nothing against them, but at that time, three players stood out in the voting, and I objectively agree with that. A tournament with 4+ people, playing best-of-two, can drag on for a couple of months, and best-of-one is not objective. So, a vote is better.

Alex is definitely great, but he has faded into the background and remains there to this day. (Besides, there is a very strong player, Medium, who has also disappeared recently.) The lack of public speaking skills won't give him a chance to win in a vote, and his statements, both to me personally and on the forum, that he no longer plays online tournaments, served as a reason for me not to include him in the potential "friendly" match. Maybe he will write his own thoughts on this. You can't be great in absentia forever:smile50: