Skip to content

CIS-2014 in Minsk.

User Avatar
#522
Auto-translated
Lizard B
There is no sarcasm here. I'm not engaging in idle chatter and I'm only offering constructive suggestions. There will most likely be more people who prefer SoD. And the aforementioned idea is based on the following key criteria: 1. Fairness while maintaining the priority of SoD, as initially promised; 2. A significant reduction in the time spent on arguments, discussions, etc., before the actual games.
1) Fairness lies in the fact that he has no choice – he doesn't choose the version (if it's WoT, he automatically becomes a spectator) and he doesn't choose the template, no, there's no sarcasm here... :)
Lizard B
I'm not engaging in idle chatter and I'm only offering constructive suggestions.
You asked for suggestions, I put forward an idea, and you haven't even commented on it in all these pages of useful discussion about which version people prefer:
scorp
in fact: there is no compromise between SoD and WoT *(I hope everyone has understood this by now, after 19 pages – if it doesn't stop...)

1) You've already created a thread for sign-ups.
2) A vote among participants for the version (once 80-99% have signed up, i.e., those who really want to be there).
3) Announcement of the official version based on the results of point 2.
**3a) And then it's up to each person to agree to play/come – if not, there will be 2 tournaments in one place (why: see *).
4) Among those who remain as participants, a vote/debate for the templates.

P.S. If this offends anyone, sorry – I just regretted missing out on CNG13.
P.P.S. If I missed something or was wrong, I'm always open to discussion.

SEPARATELY
5) As the organizer, you can announce any version without any voting, and then proceed to points 3a and 4.

If you want to "offend" as few people as possible, don't delay with point 5.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: artem

Users Online 1 users 1500 guests