CIS-2014 in Minsk.

What's the reason for my laziness? I downloaded it, installed it, spent a week trying to install a mod for Warlords, but... the community told me to go study the basics, and there are 47 pages... never mind, I'd rather play SoD.

Considering that Warlords has everything in order in terms of ease of installation and configuration: a standard installer, presets, a complete description on the website, the question should be asked of oneself: is it laziness or something else.

And regarding the rules, it's strange to expect that everything should become immediately clear and understandable through some kind of epiphany when installing a new game. As in any game: reading the manual, observing the game from the outside, testing it yourself in single-player mode. If there were no differences from SoD, why would an expansion be needed at all?
And in general, it would be good to understand why certain changes were made, otherwise, why try Warlords after SoD, where everything is already good.

2 Lider1: Complete nonsense. The emphasis is on contrasting the versions in the context of religious contradictions. The conceptual differences are not fully considered, and much attention is paid to two non-core gameplay elements of Warlords. The disadvantage of one of these elements is correctly pointed out, namely, that the troops' experience provokes unnecessary battles with neutrals.

As a result, the claims of objectivity and impartiality turned out to be completely unfounded.