Forum

That's why I made the disclaimer about conspiracy theories – Chipstone often sees planning where there is actually skillful adaptation to the situation, creating the illusion of a plan.

In reality, it was most likely like this: the scenario described by Chipstone was considered as one of the possible options, but they didn't bet on it; they worked on several options at once. In the end, this particular option worked out.

There was evidence that Putin knew two months ago that the agreement in Vilnius would not be signed, and that street unrest would follow.

But did it work out?! :confused: I doubt it even existed. As with other options. Putin and Yanukovych are not the type to conspire; rather, it was an adaptation to the situation, but not a very successful one for either side. Judging by their expressions at the press conference in Tver, they themselves did not expect to end up in such a mess. No, perhaps Putin had some plans, but that doesn't apply to Yanukovych. He's just flitting between ATMs. :D
Regarding the further development of events, it's complete nonsense. First, what is "eliminating the Maidan non-violently"? How is that even possible? Second, if this is all Putin's cunning plan, then he miscalculated a bit: in Russia, the electorate can be kept under control indefinitely, but this doesn't always work in Ukraine (the author somehow forgets that, in addition to presidents, there are also peoples who elected them. In general, it seems that in Russia, no one is familiar with the concept of the expression of will), and judging by what is happening on the Maidan, their agreements have failed. Yanukovych is already a political corpse; everyone has turned away from him (there was news that there is a Schism in his party, which is probably why he started stammering more often – the guy got drunk). And the new government will definitely revise these agreements (is this scenario provided for?). In short, it's not all that rosy...