Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Favorites, to battle! - 6 - The Battle of Favorites! - 6
The situation in the game was discussed with the judges, a report was written, confirmed, and counted. Oldboy
Oldboy draw ShameOnYou as they say, "we thought about it, and I decided" )
Funny. Now let’s all think and rewrite the reports that we don’t like or that have no meaning? No, you should have thought about it earlier when there was an opportunity. Our rules state:
Any changes to the game rules are allowed by mutual agreement of the players, except for changing the Favorite Castle and the Fair Play rule.
You had the opportunity to agree with your opponent on anything. If you appeal to the judges, then the controversial situation will be resolved according to the current rules. No changes made to the rules in the future will invalidate decisions in past games.
Next, another 2 games and also strange comments. 150+ posts for 4 games is clearly excessive. Nevertheless, I urge everyone to maintain discipline, resolve controversial situations privately, follow the rules, and if you have problems, it's not your opponent's fault.
It seems everything has been discussed in ICQ, so I hope for a calm conclusion to the tournament.