Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It just so happens that a continuous written history can only be traced back to the 17th century, and everything before that is shrouded in darkness. Most written sources from earlier periods only come to the attention of historians in the 18th and 19th centuries, when they were discovered. Or "discovered" - the forgery of ancient texts and artifacts was widespread at that time.
Archaeology can only confirm the level of cultural and technological development, but it cannot provide information about economic and political relations. In this matter, one has to rely on written sources. Or not - see above.
History, as a science, has been carefully studying written sources for over two centuries. And it mainly relies on archaeological excavations. And the artifacts extracted from the ground eloquently testify to the economic and political relations between states, classes, and nations, etc.