Satir, in the text above, called the Maidan an undoubtedly positive event, which immediately revealed his level of intellectual development.
The people are dissatisfied with the government, so they are restless. Where does this negative attitude towards an overall positive event come from?
But at least he had the sense not to develop the discussion – either he realized he had said something stupid, or he realized he was risking damaging his reputation. And that's right.
Secondly, I don't see the point in arguing with someone who, in a lecturing tone, presents their personal opinion as an absolute truth.
P.S. Thanks for the diagnosis :D
484800548