Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The satyr mentioned above called the Maidan an undoubtedly positive phenomenon, which immediately showed his level of intellectual development. But at least he had the sense not to develop the discussion further – either he realized that he had said something stupid, or he realized that he risked damaging his reputation. And that's right.
But you, I'm afraid, are no longer at risk. If one can still simply disagree or agree with your attempts to analyze the current situation, the appropriateness of the observations you add, and the events from your own life, then the tendency to resort to personal attacks against those who disagree with you is clearly incorrect and irritating. And you call Ikhti "stupid/naive" and say that the satyr "showed his level of intellectual development." Moreover, such behavior is presented as "preventively brainwashing within the framework of a discussion." It's quite strange to want a discussion and call your opponents fools. And it's also interesting, although I'm not a doctor, when did you suddenly realize that you had a mission and the right to brainwash others?