Everything I write is obvious to any reasonable person. You don't need to be a world-class political scientist to see all this. You just need to take a little interest in the events happening in our country on the internet, and not on TV.
Look - 97 years have passed since the October Revolution, is this a positive or negative event?
60 years have passed since Stalin's death, is he a positive or negative figure?
22 years have passed since the collapse of the USSR, is this a positive or negative event?
You play Heroes, is this a positive or negative phenomenon?
You are a boy, not a girl, is this a positive or negative phenomenon?
Who is cooler - a titan or a dragon?
It's not so easy to say... and if you do say, it's most likely nonsense.
That's why reasonable people usually avoid giving categorical assessments of ambiguous phenomena.
Satir, in the text above, called the Maidan an undoubtedly positive phenomenon, which immediately showed his level of intellectual development. But he at least had the sense not to develop the discussion - either he realized that he had said something stupid, or he realized that he risked damaging his reputation. And that's right.