Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
CHALLENGE The_ CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, The_'s CHALLENGE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
I've always found it strange – why use the "olympic" format in the early stages, and then switch to group play, doubles, and so on in the later stages.
For most players, the goal is to have fun, not to win.
And those who are actually aiming for victory are often overwhelmed with tournaments; they would actually benefit from finishing matches quickly. Moreover, for top players, it doesn't really matter whether they play to 1 win, 2 wins, or 3 wins – it doesn't significantly affect the overall result.
However, when players of different skill levels meet, it's quite important whether they play to 1 win or 2 wins – in the latter case, the variance is lower, and therefore the more skilled player has a higher chance of winning overall than in the former case.