DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

I've been reading through these endless threads, and I decided to share my opinion. I just don't understand Oldboy. He's obsessively trying to convince everyone that the current rules need to be changed because of one case, and not even one out of a thousand, but one out of ten thousand – that's absurd. Moreover, as I understand it, he advocates for banning necromancy and introducing new classes, claiming it will enrich the game... What can I say? It's already been implemented, and you're just heading straight to the World Tournament, but wait... there was a precedent with harpies, which, for some reason, didn't cause a global catastrophe or endless debates. No, I'd rather go back to SoD, right? Let's just change the rules that work for everyone to please one player (and not even a top player), and then, after some time, we'll have another precedent and change them again and again, right? No, no, forget it. Sorry for my language, but reading this thread in the tournament section is getting tiresome. Oldboy, if you want to write and argue, create a new thread and debate your opponents there, create a poll (but I think you won't even get 10 percent of the votes), but this is just arguing for the sake of arguing. No one will change the old, proven rules for something unclear just because of one case. I fully support Yurist and Vik regarding tactical tricks. P.S. – I propose a new rule: those who write about unrelated topics in the tournament thread should receive penalty points for each post, up to a ban. If you have a writing urge or want to comment on something, go to the forum or create your own thread. Respect the moderators' work; it's not easy for them to sort through these dialogues, and then they have to spend time cleaning up, or else they might accidentally delete someone's report