DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

Global

Games

Olden Era

Heroes VII

Heroes VI

Heroes V

Heroes IV

Heroes III

Heroes II

Heroes I

Might&Magic

King's Bounty

H and M&M

Others

Community

Tavern

Town Hall

Roha's tours

Mode

Interface scale

No background Wide layout Video previews

Loads video thumbnails from YouTube, which lets it see your IP address. Off until you turn it on, and remembered in this browser only.

Language

Content

Show the author's original text and human translations first. Machine translation is used only when nothing else exists.

Interface

Posts, wiki & tournaments are authored in English & Russian. Site labels translate to your interface choice.

Registered: 11/27/2007

Posts: 5,099

#1881 11/18/2013 10:14 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Oldboy

What is the exact contradiction? At first glance, the two questions seem unrelated.
Regarding necromancy, this is a matter of global game balance. The change improves the balance, thus enriching the game.
Regarding the patch, this is a matter of resolving a specific deadlock situation and resolving it as closely as possible to the game's intended meaning.

The contradiction lies in the fact that when constructing the rules, in one case you use the principle of "enriching the game," while in the other case, you use the principle of "close to the game's intended meaning." Why not the other way around?

Show in topic

Reading content in

Interface language