The Crusade (autumn, winter 2013-14)

As I said before, I don't remember what happened 2 months ago. I could barely remember which faction I was playing and what build I was using. Whether I attacked the Hive on September 10, 2013, at 21:56, I naturally don't remember, but after thinking about it and assessing the situation, I simply couldn't have attacked them, so I didn't agree that I had attacked them. 1. Attacking the Hive that I have in my army and that I can still gather more of is not reasonable, because this is an Anarchy build and I naturally have expert diplomacy. The Hive should be joined! With any army, I would not attack them without first scouting their disposition. 2. The dungeon they were guarding was clearly not something I needed, because there is a dungeon guarded by more peaceful goblins to the left. The opponent demanded that I attack the Hive and said that he would provide 100% proof that I had attacked before (September 10, 2013, at 21:56). I attacked. I did not consider his proof to be 100%, and I did not have the opportunity to verify it myself, because the opponent did not give me the password. I asked the judges to sort it out. They decided that it was as I said. Well, if that's the case, then that's the case! I'm not arguing. We were just finishing a save from 2 months ago, where you don't remember anything anymore. But being in a sound mind, as I explained above, I would never have attacked these Hive under any circumstances; maybe I was drunk or NOT in a sound mind :D, I naturally don't remember what state I was in either :). I agree with the verdict. As for why I didn't attack 123, it's because I didn't make it in time, I naturally don't remember how I got there 2 months ago. Perhaps I didn't go directly, without visiting the Dwarven city beforehand, as I did this time. But the opponent didn't have any complaints about that. We agreed that I would attack the next day, which I did.