Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
The answer to your question was already written by the attacker
this is not an answer to my question, but his decision, which does not justify him in any way. he lost not because he lost the battle, but because he surrendered. But bRitvo4kA
There are frequent cases when there really are no prospects, rather than a weak will to win.
I agree, when you don't see any prospects, stalling for time is not the best idea. But here, as I wrote above, luck was not on his side, nothing more. That's no reason to change the rules, especially to introduce concepts foreign to this game, like a draw due to a battle.
Added 5 minutes later Someone correctly wrote here: a precedent could be created where a deliberately losing game could be turned around by attacking a scout hero with a scout hero (or even a main hero) and creating a stalemate situation.. Now that would be truly in the spirit of the game!