Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”
I think anyone can create a topic. Even in this situation, it's more necessary for the community. Ideally, a moderator should separate the discussion into a new topic.
I don't really understand why another topic is needed at all.
The existing wording in the rules looks frankly unfair compared to the new one. Anyone who wants to can write their counterarguments, and if there are none, the moderators can discuss the details in private and simply make changes, and then notify everyone about it.
The idea that a "hypothetical fly" has an undeniable right to be considered the winner over a "hypothetical thousand skeletons," and they should leave the battlefield solely because it can fly quickly, has never been convincing to me. It was the "lesser of two evils." Well, a draw is an even "lesser of two evils."