HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

    Loads video thumbnails from YouTube, which lets it see your IP address. Off until you turn it on, and remembered in this browser only.

Mafia 73. Forest Kingdom

Show in topic
User Avatar
Online now Arandor
Registered:
Posts: 60,132
#55
Auto-translated
2. "special pollen" - is this a block? Because you can put someone to sleep in different ways.
block
3. "taunt" - does it provoke a Neutral player to use "satire"?
yes
4. "Neutral: set a trap - sets a trap for a player, and if one of the players comes to him, he is eliminated from the game." I understand that it probably says that the one who came is eliminated, and not the one to whom they came, but I want confirmation/refutation of my guess. If several players come, will the first one who comes fall into the trap, or a random one, or all of them?
yes, the first one who comes gets caught. If it's someone who can't be caught in a trap, the trap is reset, and the following ones can come without fear.
5. Let's say an Alchemist has three prisoners, can he write "Neutral: processing: process so-and-so into three paralysis potions"? Will this be counted as one Neutral action?
yes. The number of potions can be anything, but he can still only use one, unless he drinks a speed potion.
6. "use a potion" (if it's not a kill) is considered a separate Neutral action or not? If they use it, do the seekers have two more Neutral actions between them, or one?
no, using a potion is not considered a Neutral action. The exception is potions that cause death. If it's a peaceful potion, they still have two Neutral actions. But the point is that one Neutral action must be used by the Seeker, and the other by the Alchemist. Neither of them can use two Neutral actions at once, unless they drink a speed potion, in which case they can use two Neutral actions from one role.

can you use more than one potion per turn? Is the Alchemist's Neutral action different from the Seeker's similar Neutral action?
only one.
it's not different
7. "The Alchemist learns the player's affiliation to a side and can release his victim." What does "release" mean? Completely? And why? This is probably not so much a question for the GM as it is a rhetorical one. Or maybe I misunderstood this phrase.
You can release them if the Alchemist is afraid that a Minotaur will come to him, or someone will start winning. If the Minotaur puts him in a cage, everyone will be released, and it will immediately become clear who the Alchemist is. But if he doesn't have any prisoners and he is put in a cage, then his role won't be revealed either.

Be strong. Believe
0
⚖️
0
Show in topic