CIS-2014 in Minsk.

Auto-translated

Lizard B

2Kostya: The reasons why I suggested 2 brackets have already been described in detail, both here and on VT. Please, take a look if you're not too lazy). And please forgive the arguments against my scheme at the level of "in my opinion, there should be only one champion" - they don't seem very convincing.

Here are my arguments against:
1)

Wicc

I think the option with two parallel Tournaments is even less successful. Simply because in this case, the composition of both Tournaments will be significantly weakened.

Lim4

The CIS Champion is simply much better than the champion of some version.

In general, I completely agree with:

Wicc

Therefore, I am happy with the option of a WT only Tournament, as it has been for all the years before.

Also, I am generally happy with the option of a SoD only Tournament for the reasons stated on the first page.

Let the version be any, but only one and as stable as possible, without glitches, bugs, and desynchronization.

Wicc

And what legitimacy will the winner of the SoD Tournament have, if half of the real contenders for victory do not participate in it? There will be none, in general...

But here is a controversial question. I think that, for example, KobRa, Stinger, PReDS, could theoretically participate in the SoD Tournament (it all depends on which version of VT will be offered at the time of the Tournament). Plus, if a few strong SoD players break through. And who will remain in the VT version?

Added 2 minutes ago

Oldboy

But holding such a Tournament with two brackets is a format that will allow everyone who wants (and can) to gather together for such a total gathering of Heroes players.

It will be possible to gather together with any version, because practice shows that those who come, the version is not important for them (with rare exceptions)

Reading content in

Interface language

CIS-2014 in Minsk.

Statistics

Library

Users Online 8 users 1746 guests

Today's Visitors 18