Skip to content

Voting on whether to ban the mapmaker and the Fortress faction.

User Avatar
#46
Auto-translated
And then Ostap went wild...
Let's do it this way: if someone defeats a cartographer, they send a screenshot to their opponent, and the opponent must finish the game standing up, reciting the multiplication table aloud. And if it's a hill fort, they have to sit in place until the end of the game, without even getting up to go to the bathroom.

Added 5 minutes later
Ihtiandr
In general, I think it's wrong to change the rules based on such polls. Democracy is good, but a more complex system is needed, because the decision is quite important. The main problem with polls is that a significant portion of the participants are not experienced enough to assess the situation. And they vote just for fun. Also, there are many fanatical conservatives and, conversely, radicals among the voters. Only experienced players, the elite of the community, should make the decision. For example, the Arbitration Committee (AK).

This system of changing the rules would be more optimal:

Any player creates a topic to collect signatures for changing the rules. If a certain number of signatures are collected (for example, 30), the bill is sent to the AK. And among the members of the AK, a final vote is held.

And if the community does not trust the AK, you can create a special legislative body and elect its members by voting.

A perfect bureaucrat. You could send him to the Bureau of Weights and Measures in Paris right now.

This is a very important decision; the fate of many peoples is being decided! And what about the fate of the world!
Although, in reality, there is some truth to it - I would ban the noobs from the voting. And Rmax.
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.

484800548