Voting on whether to ban the mapmaker and the Fortress faction.

He was only nominated and banned again yesterday. He didn't even get 50% of the votes.

Added 16 minutes ago


Paragraph 1 - omg. It turns out the Cartographer is balancing the game!

He's not balancing it; he has his own value, which takes up space. This space and this value can be both a plus and a minus for either side. For example, the Cartographer can clear out any of the 8x8 areas and other templates. And this depletion of the area is not always a plus for those who have already developed well, because this area will be closer to the more developed player, not to the one who is catching up in development.

The Cartographer is difficult to acquire, given the current trends, so that's a separate discussion. But the Healing Fortress is a completely different story, and I mainly support it.

3 - omg. Guard, Maxim, guard. Mobs, creatures. The ones that guard the obelisk, they guard the chest. You can ALSO raise skeletons on them (resurrect fallen creatures in battle with necromancy, for example, with the hero Galtran) and ALSO break them (attack with a hero without troops, intentionally flee to the Castle, and buy him there).

What is this song about?:D You've written a hundred times about your chests; you're told that a chest is a chest, and a pillar is a pillar. A chest is for money and experience, a pillar is for the Grail. When they ban digging for the Grail, then you can raise the issue of pillars; don't you understand the essence of the matter? You yourself write that the Healing Fortress and Cartographer are banned in the rules, but you're talking about pillars (which are allowed), while blaming me for defending the Healing Fortress (which is the main goal).

4 - dug twice, but how many did you find? 0?

Dug once. It doesn't matter who dug how many times. The point is that digging is allowed, so it's too early to remove the pillars.