Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
First of all, don't go off-topic in other threads! There are dedicated threads for that!
Oh, come on, it wasn't that off-topic :) It's actually quite relevant. I saw an example of people switching from one Clan to another, or even leaving Clans altogether, so this post naturally fit into your thread.Kyle;68786
Secondly, to the point: In my opinion, it's very simple... the rating is calculated based on tournament results, so let's say: player X was in Clan A and played n tournaments, so the rating for these n tournaments is attributed to Clan A, then the player switched to Clan B, and this Clan will only be credited with the rating for new tournaments. i.e., the old rating will remain in Clan A. I think this is the fairest system. Or do you disagree?
I almost agree :) Because, hypothetically, if over time some people leave Clans, and others switch from one Clan to another, what will this Clan rating reflect when people leave their results in one Clan and then earn a rating for another? In my opinion, there's no way to avoid having Clan ratings that age over time :)