Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It is essential to introduce a rule that takes into account the percentage of voters and also sets a minimum threshold for the number of voters. For example, at least 40 forum members. This threshold should be in place to prevent a small group of like-minded individuals from significantly influencing the entire forum. In this vote, 54, 44, and 44 forum members voted in the 3 polls, which is quite normal and active.
Introducing new rules into existing ones would be good, provided that the change (innovation) in the rules receives 75% of the votes. This is the minimum percentage that should be, in my opinion, because introducing new rules with a questionable vote is definitely not a good idea; a clear majority is the right approach. However, the range of 51 to 74% can be considered seasonal priorities (like wanting one thing today and something else tomorrow), and we should also allow for the fact that not everyone votes thoughtfully and with a full understanding of the poll.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...