What is better: traditional medicine or pharmaceuticals?

Yes... That's true. But there are situations when you get sick, and then... I had one case. I got lichen. Dermatologists sent me to other doctors and prescribed some nonsense. Nothing helped. But my father found an advertisement for a grandmother who was a folk healer in the newspaper. We went there, and she prescribed herbs to drink and apply topically. After a week, there was no trace of it.

That's an interesting example, of course. But take, for example, pneumonia (simply put, inflammation of the lungs), or bronchitis... These diseases are not so rare, especially in young children. And no herbs will help here; antibiotics are needed. Otherwise, the inflammatory process in the lungs cannot be stopped, and I would like to note that there are still cases of pneumonia with a fatal outcome. You can't treat it "slowly" here; time is of the essence.
On the other hand, I don't understand people who treat every sniffle with pills. All these chemical concoctions like Coldrex are unnecessary; they can be successfully replaced with warm milk with honey or a mustard plaster.:cool:
By the way, regarding grandmothers who are folk healers: lichen is visible to the naked eye, but many diseases require tests or special examinations for their diagnosis: X-rays, ultrasound, electroencephalograms, tomography, etc. You have to agree that it is impossible to detect a hormonal imbalance by simply looking intently into someone's eyes...:smile48: